Hi, Shawn

Anson Huang
Best Regards!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Guo [mailto:shawn...@kernel.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 3, 2018 1:39 PM
> To: Robin Gong <yibin.g...@nxp.com>
> Cc: feste...@gmail.com; Anson Huang <anson.hu...@nxp.com>;
> mark.rutl...@arm.com; devicet...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org; dl-linux-imx
> <linux-...@nxp.com>; ker...@pengutronix.de; Fabio Estevam
> <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] ARM: dts: imx6sl-evk: keep sw4 always on
> 
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 02:12:52AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
> > But in fact, the original dts is not correct without
> > 'regulator-always- on'since SW4 is the critical DDR power rail,
> > although, it's kept on in the previous kernel by no switches
> > enable/disable interfaces provided in pfuze driver. Adding new
> > property which can be done totally by the common 'regulator-always-on'
> > is not a good choice. Keep the dts patch adding 'regulator-always-on'
> > ahead of pfuze driver pach adding enable/disable interface is enough for 
> > such
> case I think.
> 
> We can not just break the installed DTBs like this.  If patching regulator 
> driver
> with a new property is really difficult, we could migrate the existing users 
> in a
> 'soft' way:
 
Patching regulator driver needs to add property for those regulators can be OFF,
it will make users confuse with original regulator framework knowledge, NOT a
good idea.

> 
>  - Add required regulator-always-on for regulator nodes in DTS.
 
I & Yibin already sent out patch to add " regulator-always-on " for regulator 
nodes in DTS,
so they can be applied first?


>  - Patch i.MX platform code to check the presence of regulator-always-on
>    property for critical regulators, and give a big warning if it's
>    missing.
It is NOT easy to identify which switch is critical or NOT, and different 
platforms
have different board design, it will introduce many platform specified code, so 
I think
just revert the pfuze100 switch enable/disable patch should be OK for now. 

>  - Wait for a couple of release cycles for users to migrate.
>  - Add regulator driver patch back and break users who keep ignoring
>    the warning.
After a couple of release cycles, add the pfuze100 switch enable/disable patch
back to support this feature, I believe users should switch to new dtb with 
"regulator-always-on" 
existing already.

Anson.

> 
> Shawn

Reply via email to