2018-06-26 15:23 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>: > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 14:36 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >> 2018-06-26 14:14 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko >> <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>: >> > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:41 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >> > > What is your use case exactly? Do you have an EEPROM model that's >> > > not >> > > yet supported explicitly in the driver? Why would you need this >> > > option? >> > >> > The current at24 driver has no address width support, > >> > thus, reusing same >> > (allocated) IDs (non-DT case) is hard. > > ^^^^^ > >> Every supported compatible has the width already specified in its >> corresponding chip data. > > > Please, read again carefully what I wrote before. >
Ok makes sense in that case. Could you just point me towards an example model which has the address width different than the default for its type? Bart
