On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 14:36 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2018-06-26 14:14 GMT+02:00 Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>: > > On Tue, 2018-06-26 at 09:41 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > What is your use case exactly? Do you have an EEPROM model that's > > > not > > > yet supported explicitly in the driver? Why would you need this > > > option? > > > > The current at24 driver has no address width support, > > thus, reusing same > > (allocated) IDs (non-DT case) is hard. ^^^^^ > Every supported compatible has the width already specified in its > corresponding chip data. Please, read again carefully what I wrote before. -- Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com> Intel Finland Oy
