On Tuesday, June 19, 2018 7:02:01 PM CEST Brian Norris wrote:
> Commit bca5f557dcea ("ACPI / processor: Make
> acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() void") changed one of the declarations
> of acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed() to return void, but the !CPU_FREQ
> version still return int. Let's return void to be consistent.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannor...@chromium.org>
> ---
>  include/acpi/processor.h | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/acpi/processor.h b/include/acpi/processor.h
> index 40a916efd7c0..1194a4c78d55 100644
> --- a/include/acpi/processor.h
> +++ b/include/acpi/processor.h
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_exit(void)
>  {
>       return;
>  }
> -static inline int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr,
> +static inline void acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct acpi_processor *pr,
>                                                               int event_flag)
>  {
>       static unsigned int printout = 1;
> @@ -320,7 +320,6 @@ static inline int acpi_processor_ppc_has_changed(struct 
> acpi_processor *pr,
>                      "Consider compiling CPUfreq support into your 
> kernel.\n");
>               printout = 0;
>       }
> -     return 0;
>  }
>  static inline int acpi_processor_get_bios_limit(int cpu, unsigned int *limit)
>  {
> 

Applied, thanks!


Reply via email to