On (06/20/18 13:32), Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > So, if we could get rid of pr_cont() from the most important parts
> > (instruction dumps, etc) then I would just vote to leave pr_cont()
> > alone and avoid any handling of it in printk context tracking. Simply
> > because we wouldn't care about pr_cont(). This also could simplify
> > Tetsuo's patch significantly.
>
> Sounds good to me.
Awesome. If you and Fengguang can combine forces and lead the
whole thing towards "we couldn't care of pr_cont() less", it
would be really huuuuuge. Go for it!
-ss
