On Tuesday 19 Jun 2018 at 15:21:40 (+0530), Pavan Kondeti wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Returns the util of "cpu" if "p" wakes up on "dst_cpu".
> > + */
> > +static unsigned long cpu_util_next(int cpu, struct task_struct *p, int
> > dst_cpu)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long util, util_est;
> > + struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
> > +
> > + /* Task is where it should be, or has no impact on cpu */
> > + if ((task_cpu(p) == dst_cpu) || (cpu != task_cpu(p) && cpu != dst_cpu))
> > + return cpu_util(cpu);
> > +
> > + cfs_rq = &cpu_rq(cpu)->cfs;
> > + util = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_avg);
> > +
> > + if (dst_cpu == cpu)
> > + util += task_util(p);
> > + else
> > + util = max_t(long, util - task_util(p), 0);
> > +
> > + if (sched_feat(UTIL_EST)) {
> > + util_est = READ_ONCE(cfs_rq->avg.util_est.enqueued);
> > + if (dst_cpu == cpu)
> > + util_est += _task_util_est(p);
> > + else
> > + util_est = max_t(long, util_est - _task_util_est(p), 0);
>
> For UTIL_EST case, the waking task will not have any contribution in the
> previous CPU's util_est. So we can just use the previous CPU util_est as is.
Right, good catch, I actually spotted that one as well and already fixed it
for v4 ;-)
