* Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com> [180611 06:48]: > Hi, > > On Monday 11 June 2018 11:59 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com> [180611 06:28]: > >> Great. I thought I completely misunderstood you. But I don't see what > >> adding another function will accomplish. A QUIRK flag used in the same > >> function would work well enough> > > Fine with me as long as the function stays simple for both > > syss and sysc reset. > > > > > In general a reset status bit being in sysstatus is the norm and it > being in sysconfig should be the "quirk" for which a flag needs to be > added. What do you think?
Sure makes sense to me. > As an aside, naming bitshifts by the name of the platform they were > originally added in seems weird. There should be some generic mask > saying "soft reset is the 0th bit". Currently I am using > SYSC_OMAP4_SOFTRESET for a dra76x module. I guess it depends on how many > different sysconfig types we have. Sure we could have a macro for that. Regards, Tony
