Hi,

On Thursday 07 June 2018 01:05 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Faiz Abbas <faiz_ab...@ti.com> [180606 06:14]:
>> +static int sysc_reset(struct sysc *ddata)
>> +{
>> +    int offset = ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSCONFIG];
>> +    int val = sysc_read(ddata, offset);
>> +
>> +    val |= (0x1 << ddata->cap->regbits->srst_shift);
>> +    sysc_write(ddata, offset, val);
>> +
>> +    /* Poll on reset status */
>> +    if (ddata->cfg.quirks & SYSC_QUIRK_RESET_STATUS) {
>> +            offset = ddata->offsets[SYSC_SYSSTATUS];
>> +
>> +            return readl_poll_timeout(ddata->module_va + offset, val,
>> +                            (val & ddata->cfg.syss_mask) == 0x0,
>> +                            100, MAX_MODULE_SOFTRESET_WAIT);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> 
> I wonder if we should also add SYSS_QUIRK_RESET_STATUS in
> addition to SYSC_QUIRK_RESET status to make it easy to
> read the right register?

I assumed SYSC_QUIRK is the prefix to indicate the ti-sysc driver not
the register. Are there layouts in which the reset status bit is in the
sysconfig register rather than the sysstatus register?

Thanks,
Faiz

Reply via email to