On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 06:26:25PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/01, Christian Brauner wrote:
> >
> > security_task_kill() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's
> > actually declare it as such too.
>
> The subject/changelog is wrong, this patch changes sigkill_pending()
Ah yes, s/security_task_kill()/sigkill_pending()
Thanks!
Christian
>
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io>
> > ---
> > v1->v2:
> > * unchanged
> > v0->v1:
> > * patch added
> > ---
> > kernel/signal.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
> > index 515fa59a0e9c..d5f9472a0935 100644
> > --- a/kernel/signal.c
> > +++ b/kernel/signal.c
> > @@ -1922,10 +1922,10 @@ static inline bool may_ptrace_stop(void)
> > * Return non-zero if there is a SIGKILL that should be waking us up.
> > * Called with the siglock held.
> > */
> > -static int sigkill_pending(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > +static bool sigkill_pending(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > {
> > - return sigismember(&tsk->pending.signal, SIGKILL) ||
> > - sigismember(&tsk->signal->shared_pending.signal, SIGKILL);
> > + return sigismember(&tsk->pending.signal, SIGKILL) ||
> > + sigismember(&tsk->signal->shared_pending.signal, SIGKILL);
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > --
> > 2.17.0
> >
>
