sig_ignored() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's actually
declare it as such too.

Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io>
---
v1->v2:
* unchanged
v0->v1:
* patch added
---
 kernel/signal.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 208e99b57e6f..e48675bd3be8 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, 
bool force)
        return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig);
 }
 
-static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
+static bool sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)
 {
        /*
         * Blocked signals are never ignored, since the
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool 
force)
         * unblocked.
         */
        if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig))
-               return 0;
+               return false;
 
        /*
         * Tracers may want to know about even ignored signal unless it
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool 
force)
         * by SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE task.
         */
        if (t->ptrace && sig != SIGKILL)
-               return 0;
+               return false;
 
        return sig_task_ignored(t, sig, force);
 }
-- 
2.17.0

Reply via email to