sig_ignored() already behaves like a boolean function. Let's actually declare it as such too.
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christ...@brauner.io> --- v1->v2: * unchanged v0->v1: * patch added --- kernel/signal.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 208e99b57e6f..e48675bd3be8 100644 --- a/kernel/signal.c +++ b/kernel/signal.c @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force) return sig_handler_ignored(handler, sig); } -static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force) +static bool sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force) { /* * Blocked signals are never ignored, since the @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force) * unblocked. */ if (sigismember(&t->blocked, sig) || sigismember(&t->real_blocked, sig)) - return 0; + return false; /* * Tracers may want to know about even ignored signal unless it @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static int sig_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force) * by SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE task. */ if (t->ptrace && sig != SIGKILL) - return 0; + return false; return sig_task_ignored(t, sig, force); } -- 2.17.0