I'm not sure why this is necessary, please explain.

Is the implication here that some driver is going to poll on acpi_dispatch_gpe?
Bob


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 5:12 AM
> To: Linux ACPI <linux-a...@vger.kernel.org>
> Cc: Zhang, Rui <rui.zh...@intel.com>; Linux PM <linux-
> p...@vger.kernel.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Schmauss, Erik
> <erik.schma...@intel.com>; Moore, Robert <robert.mo...@intel.com>; Wang,
> Wendy <wendy.w...@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ACPICA: Introduce acpi_dispatch_gpe()
> 
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> 
> Introduce acpi_dispatch_gpe() as a wrapper around acpi_ev_detect_gpe()
> for checking if the given GPE (as represented by a GPE device handle and
> a GPE number) is currently active and dispatching it (if that's the
> case) outside of interrupt context.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c   |    6 ++++++
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/acpi/acpixf.h         |    1 +
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
> @@ -634,6 +634,12 @@ acpi_ev_detect_gpe(struct acpi_namespace
> 
>       flags = acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
> 
> +     if (!gpe_event_info) {
> +             gpe_event_info = acpi_ev_get_gpe_event_info(gpe_device,
> gpe_number);
> +             if (!gpe_event_info)
> +                     goto error_exit;
> +     }
> +
>       /* Get the info block for the entire GPE register */
> 
>       gpe_register_info = gpe_event_info->register_info;
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c
> @@ -639,6 +639,28 @@ ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_get_gpe_status)
> 
> 
> /***********************************************************************
> ********
>   *
> + * FUNCTION:    acpi_gispatch_gpe
> + *
> + * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device          - Parent GPE Device. NULL for
> GPE0/GPE1
> + *              gpe_number          - GPE level within the GPE block
> + *
> + * RETURN:      None
> + *
> + * DESCRIPTION: Detect and dispatch a General Purpose Event to either a
> function
> + *              (e.g. EC) or method (e.g. _Lxx/_Exx) handler.
> + *
> +
> +***********************************************************************
> +*******/ void acpi_dispatch_gpe(acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number)
> +{
> +     ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_dispatch_gpe);
> +
> +     acpi_ev_detect_gpe(gpe_device, NULL, gpe_number); }
> +
> +ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_dispatch_gpe)
> +
> +/**********************************************************************
> +*********
> + *
>   * FUNCTION:    acpi_finish_gpe
>   *
>   * PARAMETERS:  gpe_device          - Namespace node for the GPE Block
> Index: linux-pm/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> +++ linux-pm/include/acpi/acpixf.h
> @@ -753,6 +753,7 @@ ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_sta
>                                                    u32 gpe_number,
>                                                    acpi_event_status
>                                                    *event_status))
> +void acpi_dispatch_gpe(acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number);
>  ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
> acpi_disable_all_gpes(void))
> ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
> acpi_enable_all_runtime_gpes(void))
>  ACPI_HW_DEPENDENT_RETURN_STATUS(acpi_status
> acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes(void))

Reply via email to