On 05/11/2018 11:02 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 10:54:09AM -0500, Alex G. wrote:
>> That being clarified, should I replace "crackmonkey" with "broken" in
>> the commit message?
>
> Keep your opinion *outside* of commit messages - their goal is to
> explain *why* the change is being made in strictly technical language so
> that when someone looks at git history, someone can know *why*.
>
>> Borislav, I sense some confusion. AER is not a "reporting" driver. It
>> handles the errors. You can't leave these errors unhandled. They
>> propagate to the root complex and can cause fatal MCEs when not handled.
>> The window to handle the error is pretty large, so it's not a concern
>> when you're handling it.
>
> I think *you* didn't get it: IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER) is not
> enough of a check to confirm that there actually *is* an AER driver to
> handle the errors. If you really want to make sure the driver is loaded
> and functioning, then you need an explicit registering mechanism or some
> other way of checking it really is there and handling errors.
config ACPI_APEI_PCIEAER
bool "APEI PCIe AER logging/recovering support"
depends on ACPI_APEI && PCIEAER
help
PCIe AER errors may be reported via APEI firmware first mode.
Turn on this option to enable the corresponding support.
PCIAER is not modularizable. QED
Alex
