On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote: > "pwm0" sounds like a zero-indexed instance of some pwm block. If 0 is > the version here, I'd suggest to make it "pwm-0" for example - you might > want to take a look at the Xilinx bindings, which use a strict x.yy suffix.
That's fine. I'll change it to pwm-0.00 in the next patch series. > Most SoCs don't have clearly versioned IP though, that's why for > community-contributed bindings the first SoC we encounter the IP in > usually gets the name. In this particular case, we do have versioned IP, and we will be contributing drivers for those which wind up in linux-capable chips.
