On 04/26, Michal Hocko wrote: > > then I suspect that we should be better off reconsidering > mm->owner and try to come up with something more clever. I've had a > patch to remove owner few years back.
Yeees, I do remember we discussed this but I forgot everything. I agree, it would nice to turn mm->owner into mm->mem_cgroup and just kill the ugly mm_update_next_owner/etc. Oleg.
