On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 05:09:08PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i'm pleased to announce release -v15 of the CFS scheduler patchset.
Do I smell a bug when a task switches its scheduling classes? Lets say a task was in real-time class for a long time and switches to fair-sched class. When update_curr() is called on this new fair-sched task, some of required fields (for ex: exec_start) are uninitialized and can lead to bogus calculations? Also, real-time tasks are currently influencing fair clock calculations (because there is only one raw_weighted_load field per runqueue). Is that intentional? -- Regards, vatsa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
