On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 10:49:34AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> -static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(void) >> +static inline ktime_t tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(ktime_t *delta_next) >> { >> - return NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ; >> + *delta_next = NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ; >> + return *delta_next; > > Shouldn't that be TICK_NSEC ?
Yes, it should.