On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:17 PM Matthias Kaehlcke <m...@chromium.org> wrote: > Even with clang having known issues it would be preferable not to > break kernel builds with clang, if this doesn't place a signifcant > burden on the kernel. I'm not sure it is strictly necessary to 'wait' > for clang to enforce asm-goto for gcc (and thus the vast majority of > builds), which is the primary goal of your patch. Couldn't we just > exclude clang for now from raising the error when lack of asm-goto > support is detected?
In particular, I worry that this now stalls adding clang support to 0-day, since now this will fail outright to compile. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers
