On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 10:33:04AM +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> -int rhashtable_walk_start_check(struct rhashtable_iter *iter)
> +int rhashtable_walk_start_continue(struct rhashtable_iter *iter, struct
> rhash_head *obj)
> __acquires(RCU)
> {
> struct rhashtable *ht = iter->ht;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
>
> + if (!obj || iter->p != obj)
> + iter->p = NULL;
Why bother with this check at all? Couldn't we make it so that
if you call continue then you continue with the cursor otherwise
you set it to NULL as we currently do.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
