Allwinner devices are OK, Exynos devices (except 4210) are OK. ------------------ Original ------------------ From: "Tony Lindgren"<t...@atomide.com>; Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2018 11:37 PM To: "陈华才"<che...@lemote.com>; Cc: "Andrew Morton"<a...@linux-foundation.org>; "Fabio Estevam"<feste...@gmail.com>; "Stephen Rothwell"<s...@canb.auug.org.au>; "Rich Felker"<dal...@libc.org>; "Russell King"<li...@arm.linux.org.uk>; "Yoshinori Sato"<ys...@users.sourceforge.jp>; "linux-kernel"<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Ralf Baechle"<r...@linux-mips.org>; "linux-omap"<linux-o...@vger.kernel.org>; "James Hogan"<james.ho...@mips.com>; "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"<linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org>; Subject: Re: Regression with arm in next with stack protector * 陈华才 <che...@lemote.com> [180326 06:59]: > Hi, Tony and Fabio, > > Could you please upload your kernel binary to somewhere for me? I don't > understand why some ARM boards is OK while others are broken.
Well the kernel I'm testing is just current Linux next cross compiled omap2plus_defconfig kernel. I do have few more config options enabled like LOCKDEP and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP, but I doubt they matter here :) Then I'm using gcc-7.3.0 and binutils-2.30 built with the buildall.git scripts: git://git.infradead.org/users/segher/buildall.git If you still need binaries, let me know. Do you know which arm devices are working with your patch? Regards, Tony
