-0800, Sai Praneeth Prakhya wrote:
> > @@ -329,6 +331,19 @@ static int __init efisubsys_init(void)
> >             return 0;
> >
> >     /*
> > +    * Since we process only one efi_runtime_service() at a time, an
> > +    * ordered workqueue (which creates only one execution context)
> > +    * should suffice all our needs.
> > +    */
> > +   efi_rts_wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("efi_rts_workqueue", 0);
> > +   if (!efi_rts_wq) {
> > +           pr_err("Failed to create efi_rts_workqueue, EFI runtime services
> "
> > +                  "disabled.\n");
> > +           clear_bit(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES, &efi.flags);
> > +           return 0;
> > +   }
> 
> I'm a little worried that something might sample this flag between it being 
> set in
> an early_initcall (arm_enable_runtime_services), and cleared in a 
> subsys_initcall
> here.
> 
> However, nothing seems to do that so far, so maybe that's ok...
> 

Thanks for raising this. I will take a look at initcalls.

> [...]
> 
> > +/* efi_runtime_service() function identifiers */ enum {
> > +   GET_TIME,
> > +   SET_TIME,
> > +   GET_WAKEUP_TIME,
> > +   SET_WAKEUP_TIME,
> > +   GET_VARIABLE,
> > +   GET_NEXT_VARIABLE,
> > +   SET_VARIABLE,
> > +   SET_VARIABLE_NONBLOCKING,
> > +   QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO,
> > +   QUERY_VARIABLE_INFO_NONBLOCKING,
> > +   GET_NEXT_HIGH_MONO_COUNT,
> > +   RESET_SYSTEM,
> > +   UPDATE_CAPSULE,
> > +   QUERY_CAPSULE_CAPS,
> > +};
> 
> Can we please give this enum a name....

Sure! Added in V3.

> 
> [...]
> 
> > +/*
> > + * efi_runtime_work:       Details of EFI Runtime Service work
> > + * @func:          EFI Runtime Service function identifier
> > + * @arg<1-5>:              EFI Runtime Service function arguments
> > + * @status:                Status of executing EFI Runtime Service
> > + */
> > +struct efi_runtime_work {
> > +   u8 func;
> 
> ... and use it here rather than an opaque u8? I realise that means placing the
> enum in <linux/efi.h>.
> 

Actually, with Miguel comments, I am considering making this struct static and 
moving
it to runtime-wrappers.c, since "struct efi_runtime_work" isn't really being 
used anywhere
except runtime-wrappers.c. Please see in V3.

> > +   void *arg1;
> > +   void *arg2;
> > +   void *arg3;
> > +   void *arg4;
> > +   void *arg5;
> > +   efi_status_t status;
> > +   struct work_struct work;
> > +};
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark.

Reply via email to