On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 12:36:55PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote: > wrong to depend on two variables winding up in at adjacent offsets. I'd like if it will be written explicitly in the specs that it's forbidden to rely on that. I grepped the specs and I didn't find anything. So I wasn't sure if I missed the information in the specs or not. I never investigated on it because I always considered it bad coding regardless the fact it's guaranteed to generate the right asm with the _current_ tools. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Universal debug macros. Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Universal debug macros. Andrew E. Mileski
- Re: Universal debug macros. Richard B. Johnson
- Re: Universal debug macros. Andrew E. Mileski
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Adam J. Richter
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Michael Meissner
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Horst von Brand
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Michael Meissner
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Andrea Arcangeli