On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 12:10:33PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > If you have two files: > > test1.c: > > int a,b,c; > > > > test2.c: > > int a,c; > > > > Which is _stronger_? > > Those won't link together as they aren't declared static. Try it. They _will_ link together. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" David S. Miller
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Werner Almesberger
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Michael Meissner
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Horst von Brand
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Alexander Viro
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Michael Meissner
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Andreas Schwab
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Michael Meissner
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Marcus Sundberg
- Re: real_root_dev Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Richard B. Johnson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Michael Meissner