On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 03:25:10PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
> 
> This commit adds a litmus test in which P0() and P1() form a lock-based S
> litmus test, with the addition of P2(), which observes P0()'s and P1()'s
> accesses with a full memory barrier but without the lock.  This litmus
> test asks whether writes carried out by two different processes under the
> same lock will be seen in order by a third process not holding that lock.
> The answer to this question is "yes" for all architectures supporting

Hmm.. it this true? Our spin_lock() is RCpc because of PowerPC, so
spin_lock()+spin_unlock() pairs don't provide transitivity, and that's
why we have smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(). Is there something I'm missing?
Or there is an upcomming commit to switch PowerPC's lock implementation?

[Cc ppc maintainers]

Regards,
Boqun

> the Linux kernel, but is "no" according to the current version of LKMM.
> 
> A patch to LKMM is under development.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <st...@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  .../ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus     | 41 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 
> tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> 
> diff --git 
> a/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus 
> b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7a39a0aaa976
> --- /dev/null
> +++ 
> b/tools/memory-model/litmus-tests/ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
> +C ISA2+pooncelock+pooncelock+pombonce.litmus
> +
> +(*
> + * Result: Sometimes
> + *
> + * This test shows that the ordering provided by a lock-protected S
> + * litmus test (P0() and P1()) are not visible to external process P2().
> + * This is likely to change soon.
> + *)
> +
> +{}
> +
> +P0(int *x, int *y, spinlock_t *mylock)
> +{
> +     spin_lock(mylock);
> +     WRITE_ONCE(*x, 1);
> +     WRITE_ONCE(*y, 1);
> +     spin_unlock(mylock);
> +}
> +
> +P1(int *y, int *z, spinlock_t *mylock)
> +{
> +     int r0;
> +
> +     spin_lock(mylock);
> +     r0 = READ_ONCE(*y);
> +     WRITE_ONCE(*z, 1);
> +     spin_unlock(mylock);
> +}
> +
> +P2(int *x, int *z)
> +{
> +     int r1;
> +     int r2;
> +
> +     r2 = READ_ONCE(*z);
> +     smp_mb();
> +     r1 = READ_ONCE(*x);
> +}
> +
> +exists (1:r0=1 /\ 2:r2=1 /\ 2:r1=0)
> -- 
> 2.5.2
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to