On Saturday 20 January 2018 10:43 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> +
> +void __init dm365_pll_clk_init(void __iomem *pll1, void __iomem *pll2)
> +{
> + const struct davinci_pll_sysclk_info *info;
> +
> + davinci_pll_clk_register(&dm365_pll1_info, "ref_clk", pll1);
> +
> + davinci_pll_auxclk_register("pll1_auxclk", pll1);
> +
> + davinci_pll_sysclkbp_clk_register("pll1_sysclkbp", pll1);
> +
> + davinci_pll_obsclk_register(&dm365_pll1_obsclk_info, pll1);
> +
> + for (info = dm365_pll1_sysclk_info; info->name; info++)
> + davinci_pll_sysclk_register(info, pll1);
> +
> + davinci_pll_clk_register(&dm365_pll2_info, "oscin", pll2);
As pointed out in other patches, I think we can remove "oscin" here and
also get rid of clk_register_fixed_factor() for oscin in
davinci_pll_clk_register().
Rest of the patch looks good to me.
Thanks,
Sekhar
