On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> wrote: > I just checked a recent report from the Syzbot, and it's not fixed. > The raw.log file still uses a Content-Type of > Application/Octet-stream. Worse the reproducer C source file has a > content type of Application/Octet-stream instead of the much more sane > Application/text. <Face palm>
I will look into using a different mailing system which allows more control over email contents. A quick fix for raw.log will be to rename it to raw.log.txt. Not sure if text/plain repro.c.txt is better than application/octet-stream repro.c...
