On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 07:48:55AM +0530, Kaiwan N Billimoria wrote: > The script attempts to detect the architecture it's running upon; as of now, > we explicitly support x86_64, PPC64 and x86_32. > If it's one of them, we proceed "normally". If we fail to detect the arch, > we fallback to 64-bit scanning, unless the user has passed either of these > option switches: "--opt-32bit" and/or "--page-offset-32bit=<val>". > > If so, we switch to scanning for leaked addresses based on the value of > PAGE_OFFSET (via an auto-detected or fallback mechanism). > > As of now, we have code (or "rules") to detect special cases for x86_64 and > PPC64 > (in the get_address_re sub). Also, we now have also builtin "stubs", for lack > of a better term, where additional rules for other 64-bit arch's can be > plugged into the code, > in future, as applicable. > > Signed-off-by: Kaiwan N Billimoria <kaiwan.billimo...@gmail.com> > > --- > scripts/leaking_addresses.pl | 190 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) > > This patch is based on Tobin's suggestions and my replies to them (see prev > email in this thread).
Hi, Can you resend this with a version number please. Also can you include what testing you have done please. I'm away on Christmas holidays at the moment but I'll review soon as I'm back. Thanks, Tobin.
