On 28 Nov 00 at 12:04, David S. Miller wrote: > > Yes, it is identical copy. But I do not think that hdd can write same > data into two places with one command... > > Petr, did the af_inet.c assertions get triggered on this > same machine? No, ext2fs is at home, and af_inet is at work... At work I'm using vmware, at home I do not use it... But kernel sources are same (g450 patch for matroxfb, ncpfs supporting device nodes, threaded ipx; but neither ncpfs nor ipx is compiled at home). Petr Vandrovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Petr Vandrovec
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Petr Vandrovec
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption David S. Miller
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Daniel Phillips
- [PATCH] Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Daniel Phillips
- Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs cor... Alexander Viro
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Petr Vandrovec
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Jens Axboe
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Andrea Arcangeli
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Jens Axboe
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Andre Hedrick
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Petr Vandrovec
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption schwidefsky
- Re: 2.4.0-test11 ext2 fs corruption Alexander Viro