On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:30:29PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> @@ -314,6 +315,9 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
>               unsigned long j_util, j_max;
>               s64 delta_ns;
>  
> +             if (j_sg_cpu != sg_cpu)
> +                     sugov_get_util(j_sg_cpu);
> +
>               /*
>                * If the CFS CPU utilization was last updated before the
>                * previous frequency update and the time elapsed between the
> @@ -327,12 +331,7 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
>               if (delta_ns > TICK_NSEC) {
>                       j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost = 0;
>                       j_sg_cpu->iowait_boost_pending = false;
> -                     j_sg_cpu->util_cfs = 0;
> -                     if (j_sg_cpu->util_dl == 0)
> -                             continue;
>               }
> -             if (j_sg_cpu->flags & SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT)
> -                     return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
>  
>               j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
>               j_util = sugov_aggregate_util(j_sg_cpu);

The below makes more sense to me too; hmm?

@@ -335,12 +335,11 @@ static unsigned int sugov_next_freq_shar
 
                j_max = j_sg_cpu->max;
                j_util = sugov_aggregate_util(j_sg_cpu);
+               sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);
                if (j_util * max > j_max * util) {
                        util = j_util;
                        max = j_max;
                }
-
-               sugov_iowait_boost(j_sg_cpu, &util, &max);
        }
 
        return get_next_freq(sg_policy, util, max);

Reply via email to