> >>> + nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr( >>> + msr_bitmap_l1, msr_bitmap_l0, >>> + APIC_BASE_MSR + (APIC_TASKPRI >> 4), >>> + MSR_TYPE_W); >> >> I'd vote for indenting the parameters properly (even though we exceed 80 >> chars by 1 then :) ) > > Ok, will do. Regarding the WARN, I'm undecided. I like the idea of not > calling a function that works on MSR bitmaps unless you have one...
At least from a point of documentation it should be fine: "return false to indicate that we do not use the hardware" +gcc will inline this either way. > > Paolo > -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
