On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:58:01PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 09/12/2017 à 01:25, Fenghua Yu a écrit : > > From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua...@intel.com> > > > > With more flag bits in /proc/cpuinfo for RDT, it's better to classify the > > bits for readability. > > > > Some previously missing bits are added as well. > > > > Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua...@intel.com> > > --- > > Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt | 7 ++++++- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt > > b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt > > index 6851854..9b62738 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/x86/intel_rdt_ui.txt > > @@ -7,7 +7,12 @@ Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com> > > Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shiva...@intel.com> > > > > This feature is enabled by the CONFIG_INTEL_RDT Kconfig and the > > -X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits "rdt", "cqm", "cat_l3" and "cdp_l3". > > +X86 /proc/cpuinfo flag bits: > > +RDT (Resource Director Technology) Allocation - "rdt_a" > > +CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) - "cat_l3", "cdp_l3", "cat_l2" > > Why not "Code and Data Prioritization" for cdp_l3?
CDP is an extension of CAT. So I just put cdp_l3 into the CAT class. Thanks. -Fenghua
