On 05/12/2017 at 15:06:46 +0100, linux-kernel-...@beckhoff.com wrote:
> +/* This function is the RTC interrupt service routine. */
> +static irqreturn_t mxc_rtc_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +     struct platform_device *pdev = dev_id;
> +     struct mxc_rtc_data *pdata = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +     void __iomem *ioaddr = pdata->ioaddr;
> +     unsigned long flags;
> +     u32 events = 0;
> +     u32 lp_status;
> +     u32 lp_cr;
> +
> +     spin_lock_irqsave(&pdata->lock, flags);
> +     if (clk_prepare_enable(pdata->clk)) {
> +             spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pdata->lock, flags);
> +             return IRQ_NONE;
> +     }
> +
> +     lp_status = readl(ioaddr + SRTC_LPSR);
> +     lp_cr = readl(ioaddr + SRTC_LPCR);
> +
> +     /* update irq data & counter */
> +     if (lp_status & SRTC_LPSR_ALP) {
> +             if (lp_cr & SRTC_LPCR_ALP)
> +                     events = (RTC_AF | RTC_IRQF);

I would just call rtc_update_irq here...

> +
> +             /* disable further lp alarm interrupts */
> +             lp_cr &= ~(SRTC_LPCR_ALP | SRTC_LPCR_WAE);
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Update interrupt enables */
> +     writel(lp_cr, ioaddr + SRTC_LPCR);
> +
> +     /* clear interrupt status */
> +     writel(lp_status, ioaddr + SRTC_LPSR);
> +
> +     mxc_rtc_sync_lp_locked(ioaddr);
> +     rtc_update_irq(pdata->rtc, 1, events);

... because calling it here with events == 0 will result in a lot of
work for nothing (the core will walk through the timers and set the
alarm again).


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Reply via email to