Hello,
Eric Biggers writes:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 10:40:12AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> We noticed LTP keyctl06 test regression in
>>
>> commit: 3239b6f29bdfb4b0a2ba59df995fc9e6f4df7f1f ("KEYS: return full count
>> in keyring_read() if buffer is too small")
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
>>
>> on test machine: 48 threads Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v2 @ 2.70GHz with
>> 64G memory
>> with following parameters:
>>
>> disk: 1HDD
>> fs: ext4
>> test: syscalls_part2
>>
>> test-description: The LTP testsuite contains a collection of tools for
>> testing the Linux kernel and related features.
>> test-url: http://linux-test-project.github.io/
>>
>> To reproduce:
>>
>> git clone https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests.git
>> cd lkp-tests
>> bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email
>> bin/lkp run job.yaml
>>
>> testcase/path_params/tbox_group/run: ltp/1HDD-ext4-syscalls_part2/ivb44
>>
>
> Did this include LTP commit f21703fe45d3 ("syscalls/keyctl06: update to test
> for
> follow-on fix")? It would be really helpful if these reports would include
> the
> LTP commit that was used.
>
> Eric
We are getting the following result, even with the follow up patch:
keyctl06.c:68: FAIL: KEYCTL_READ returned 4 but expected 8
This is with SUSE SLE15 kernel 4.12.14. I haven't had chance to
investigate it yet.
--
Thank you,
Richard.
