Hi Rob,

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 02:29:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Some "atmel,at25" compatible SPI EEPROMs (e.g. Microchip 25lc040) use an
>> odd number of address bits.  This patch series adds support for
>> instantiating such devices from DT.
>>
>> Do EEPROMs using 17 or 25 address bits, as mentioned in
>> include/linux/spi/eeprom.h, really exist?
>> Or should we just limit it to a single odd value (9 bits)?
>>
>> This has been tested with a bunch of 25lc040 EEPROMs.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Geert Uytterhoeven (3):
>>   eeprom: at25: Add DT support for EEPROMs with odd address bits
>>   dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Grammar s/are can/can/
>>   dt-bindings: eeprom: at25: Document device-specific compatible values
>
> 2 and 3 are fixes and I'll apply for 4.15 if you don't mind.

Thanks, I don't mind.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Reply via email to