> Why would you compile the kernel without optimization? Can another reason be occasionally still relevant?
Will the compilation be a bit quicker when extra data processing could be omitted? > There's many places in the kernel that WILL NOT BUILD without optimization. Would you like to keep the software situation in this way? > In fact, we do a lot of tricks to make sure that things work the way > we expect it to, because we add broken code that only gets compiled out > when gcc optimizes the code the way we expect it to be, > and the kernel build will break otherwise. * Can this goal be also achieved without the addition of “broken code”? * How do you think about to improve the error handling there? Regards, Markus
