On 8 November 2017 at 07:34, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masah...@socionext.com> wrote:
> It is not efficient to call gpiod_to_irq() regardless the flag, then
> ignore the returned irq if MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL.
>
> Move gpiod_to_irq() after the MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL check.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
Thanks, applied for next!
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
>
> drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c | 14 ++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
> index 863f1db..f7c6e05 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/slot-gpio.c
> @@ -121,20 +121,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mmc_gpio_request_ro);
> void mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq(struct mmc_host *host)
> {
> struct mmc_gpio *ctx = host->slot.handler_priv;
> - int ret, irq;
> + int irq = -EINVAL;
> + int ret;
>
> if (host->slot.cd_irq >= 0 || !ctx || !ctx->cd_gpio)
> return;
>
> - irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio);
> -
> /*
> - * Even if gpiod_to_irq() returns a valid IRQ number, the platform
> might
> - * still prefer to poll, e.g., because that IRQ number is already used
> - * by another unit and cannot be shared.
> + * Do not use IRQ if the platform prefers to poll, e.g., because that
> + * IRQ number is already used by another unit and cannot be shared.
> */
> - if (irq >= 0 && host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL)
> - irq = -EINVAL;
> + if (!(host->caps & MMC_CAP_NEEDS_POLL))
> + irq = gpiod_to_irq(ctx->cd_gpio);
>
> if (irq >= 0) {
> if (!ctx->cd_gpio_isr)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
