On 10.11.2017 17:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:29:14 +0200 "Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <[email protected]> wrote:+void trace_graph_register_gui_handler(struct graph_info *info, + struct gui_event_handler *handler) { + handler->next = info->event_handlers; + info->event_handlers = handler; +} ++void trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(TraceViewStore *store, struct gui_event_handler *handler)+{ + handler->next = store->event_handlers; + store->event_handlers = handler; +} +Hmm, and in the last patch we have: + trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, switch_handler); + trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, wakeup_handler); + + trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, switch_handler); + trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, wakeup_handler); I think I see an issue here. ;-) (Hint, what's the state of switch_handler->next and wakeup_handler->next, when this is done?)
I see the issue now. Thank you very much! Yordan
-- Steve

