On 10.11.2017 17:28, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:29:14 +0200
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <[email protected]> wrote:


+void trace_graph_register_gui_handler(struct graph_info *info,
+                                     struct gui_event_handler *handler) {
+       handler->next = info->event_handlers;
+       info->event_handlers = handler;
+}
+

+void trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(TraceViewStore *store, struct gui_event_handler *handler)
+{
+       handler->next = store->event_handlers;
+       store->event_handlers = handler;
+}
+

Hmm, and in the last patch we have:

+               trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, switch_handler);
+               trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, wakeup_handler);
+
+               trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, 
switch_handler);
+               trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo, 
wakeup_handler);

I think I see an issue here. ;-)

(Hint, what's the state of switch_handler->next and
  wakeup_handler->next, when this is done?)
I see the issue now.
Thank you very much!
Yordan

-- Steve

Reply via email to