On Fri, 10 Nov 2017 14:29:14 +0200
"Yordan Karadzhov (VMware)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> +void trace_graph_register_gui_handler(struct graph_info *info,
> + struct gui_event_handler *handler) {
> + handler->next = info->event_handlers;
> + info->event_handlers = handler;
> +}
> +
>
> +void trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(TraceViewStore *store, struct
> gui_event_handler *handler)
> +{
> + handler->next = store->event_handlers;
> + store->event_handlers = handler;
> +}
> +
Hmm, and in the last patch we have:
+ trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, switch_handler);
+ trace_view_store_register_gui_handler(ks_store, wakeup_handler);
+
+ trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo,
switch_handler);
+ trace_graph_register_gui_handler(ks_info->ginfo,
wakeup_handler);
I think I see an issue here. ;-)
(Hint, what's the state of switch_handler->next and
wakeup_handler->next, when this is done?)
-- Steve
