3.16.50-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> commit ba0635ffb7665d76715b43ae8144e014a90c1e63 upstream. Static checkers complain that we should probably add curly braces because, from the indenting, it looks like seq_printf() should be inside the list_for_each_entry() loop. But the code is actually correct, it's just the indenting which is off. Besides fixing the indenting on seq_printf(), I did add curly braces, because generally mult-line indents should have curly braces to make them more readable. The unintended indent was left behind and not unindented in commit d7f46fc4e7323887494db13f063a8e59861fefb0 Author: Ben Widawsky <[email protected]> Date: Fri Dec 6 14:10:55 2013 -0800 drm/i915: Make pin count per VMA Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]> --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -141,10 +141,11 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct obj->madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED ? " purgeable" : ""); if (obj->base.name) seq_printf(m, " (name: %d)", obj->base.name); - list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) + list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link) { if (vma->pin_count > 0) pin_count++; - seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count); + } + seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count); if (obj->pin_display) seq_printf(m, " (display)"); if (obj->fence_reg != I915_FENCE_REG_NONE)
