[Tigran Aivazian] > _BUT_ never let this to be a default option, please. Because there > are valid cases where a programmer things "this is in .data" and that > means this should be in .data. If you are writing the sort of code that cares which section it ends up in, you need to use __attribute__((section)). You probably will be using things like __attribute__((align)) as well. Relying on compiler behavior here is dangerous. I agree though that an option is called for, either -fassume-bss-zero or -fno-assume-bss-zero, not sure which should be the default. Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Herbert Xu
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... James A Sutherland
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... James A Sutherland
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Michael Meissner
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Martin Mares
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Herbert Xu
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Helge Hafting
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Peter Samuelson