On Sat, Nov 25, 2000 at 10:53:00PM +0000, James A Sutherland wrote: > Which is silly. The variable is explicitly defined to be zero > anyway, whether you put this in your code or not. Why doesn't the compiler just leave out explicit zeros from the 'initial data' segment then? Seems like it ought to be tought to.. Tim. */
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Russell King
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0" Herbert Xu
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = 0&qu... Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... James A Sutherland
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Tim Waugh
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... James A Sutherland
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Tigran Aivazian
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Philipp Rumpf
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "... Peter Samuelson
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Michael Meissner
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Jeff Garzik
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static fo... Andries Brouwer
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "stat... Martin Mares
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Herbert Xu
- Re: [PATCH] removal of "static foo = ... Helge Hafting