From: Ilya Matveychikov <matvejchi...@gmail.com>

commit a91e0f680bcd9e10c253ae8b62462a38bd48f09f upstream.

When using get_options() it's possible to specify a range of numbers,
like 1-100500.  The problem is that it doesn't track array size while
calling internally to get_range() which iterates over the range and
fills the memory with numbers.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2613c75c-b04d-4bff-82a6-12f97ba0f...@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ilya V. Matveychikov <matvejchi...@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>
---
 lib/cmdline.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/cmdline.c b/lib/cmdline.c
index eb67911..efc35fb 100644
--- a/lib/cmdline.c
+++ b/lib/cmdline.c
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@
  *     the values[M, M+1, ..., N] into the ints array in get_options.
  */
 
-static int get_range(char **str, int *pint)
+static int get_range(char **str, int *pint, int n)
 {
        int x, inc_counter, upper_range;
 
        (*str)++;
        upper_range = simple_strtol((*str), NULL, 0);
        inc_counter = upper_range - *pint;
-       for (x = *pint; x < upper_range; x++)
+       for (x = *pint; n && x < upper_range; x++, n--)
                *pint++ = x;
        return inc_counter;
 }
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ char *get_options(const char *str, int nints, int *ints)
                        break;
                if (res == 3) {
                        int range_nums;
-                       range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, ints + i);
+                       range_nums = get_range((char **)&str, ints + i, nints - 
i);
                        if (range_nums < 0)
                                break;
                        /*
-- 
2.8.0.rc2.1.gbe9624a

Reply via email to