On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 07:10:11PM +0000, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> wrote: > > CC intel-gfx. > > Thanks, these are all interesting (even if some of them seem to be > from random kernels). > > Fengguang, is this a new script that you started running? Because I'm > *hoping* it's not that rc6 suddenly seems so flaky, and it's really > that you now have a nice new script that started reporting these > things better, even though many of them may be old?
yep, on our side there isn't anything on 4.14-rc6 from i915 that could justify this issues. I hope... Well, on the other hand it would be easier to bisect if this is a 4.14-rc6 thing since we just got one patch for i915 and few patches for gvt for this -rc6. > > This particular one I will have to leave to the intel gfx people to comment > on. why is the bisect hard on this case in particularly? random? Is is reported anywhere where we could have access to full logs? I couldn't find any related open issue on our side. Nothing like this on our CI apparently as well. Other related cases that I saw with vblank time out like this, something else on CPU/GPU had already died before that hence the vblank never recieved. So I'd like to see more logs to have a better idea. Thanks, Rodrigo. > > Linus > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
