On 10/26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 10/26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Hi Chao,
> >
> > On 10/26, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On 10/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > > >
> > > > On 2017/10/26 16:42, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > Hi Chao,
> > > > >
> > > > > It seems this is a critical problem, so let me integrate this patch
> > > > > with your
> > > > > initial patch "f2fs: support flexible inline xattr size".
> > > > > Let me know, if you have any other concern.
> > > >
> > > > Better. ;)
> > > >
> > > > Please add commit message of this patch into initial patch "f2fs:
> > > > support
> > > > flexible inline xattr size".
> >
> > BTW, I read the patch again, and couldn't catch the problem actually.
> > We didn't assign inline_xattr all the time, instead do if inline_xattr
> > is set. Have you done some tests with this? I'm failing tests with these
> > changes.
>
> Could you take a look at this change?
In addition to this f2fs-tools?
---
include/f2fs_fs.h | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/f2fs_fs.h b/include/f2fs_fs.h
index 09b2a60..66c446c 100644
--- a/include/f2fs_fs.h
+++ b/include/f2fs_fs.h
@@ -1056,14 +1056,12 @@ static inline int __get_extra_isize(struct f2fs_inode
*inode)
extern struct f2fs_configuration c;
static inline int get_inline_xattr_addrs(struct f2fs_inode *inode)
{
- if ((c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_EXTRA_ATTR)) &&
- (c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR)))
+ if (c.feature & cpu_to_le32(F2FS_FEATURE_FLEXIBLE_INLINE_XATTR))
return le16_to_cpu(inode->i_inline_xattr_size);
- else if (!(inode->i_inline & F2FS_INLINE_XATTR) &&
- (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)))
- return 0;
- else
+ else if (inode->i_inline & F2FS_INLINE_XATTR)
return DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS;
+ else
+ return 0;
}
#define get_extra_isize(node) __get_extra_isize(&node->i)
--
2.7.4
