Hi, I just patched my kernel and here are my results: > systems. Please apply and give me the "IRQ to pin mappings:" part of the > bootstrap log. I'm pretty confident we get everything fine there, but > just in case... 0 0 00 IRQ to pin mappings: IRQ0 -> 0:2 IRQ1 -> 0:1 IRQ3 -> 0:3 IRQ4 -> 0:4 IRQ6 -> 0:6 IRQ7 -> 0:7 IRQ8 -> 0:8 IRQ9 -> 0:9 IRQ12 -> 0:12 IRQ16 -> 1:0 IRQ17 -> 1:1 IRQ20 -> 1:4 IRQ24 -> 1:8 IRQ25 -> 1:9 Just curious : what do these numbers on the right refer to ? Are they real physical pins of the processor ? > Patch-2.4.0-test11-pic_debug-0 fetches as much as possible from chips > involved in IRQ handling. Most of the code is already in place -- the > patch only adds another magic SysRq command (credit goes for Andrew Morton > for the idea). Please apply the patch and provide me the output of > SysRq+A (you need to have MAGIC_SYSRQ enabled) as caught just after a > bootstrap and then after you notice the timer IRQ counter no longer > advances. I strongly suspect some software (be it XFree86 or not) enables > one of the 8259A inputs which should remain disabled. This would lead to > symptoms as you describe due to the special 8259A setup we use when the > workaround is in use. Here are both outputs: Just after bootstrap: Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: SysRq: Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: print_PIC() Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: printing PIC contents Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: print_IO_APIC() Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: testing the IO APIC....................... Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: .................................... done. Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: print_all_local_APICs() Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC ID: 03000000 (3) Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC VERSION: 00040011 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 last message repeated 9 times Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000010000000100000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 last message repeated 2 times Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000100000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 last message repeated 4 times Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000010000000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC ID: 00000000 (0) Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC VERSION: 00040011 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 last message repeated 9 times Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000010000000100000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 last message repeated 8 times Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000010000000000000000 Nov 27 16:51:35 pc8-118 kernel: And then a quite different one after the locks: Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: SysRq: Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: print_PIC() Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: printing PIC contents Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: print_IO_APIC() Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: testing the IO APIC....................... Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: .................................... done. Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: print_all_local_APICs() Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC ID: 00000000 (0) Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC VERSION: 00040011 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 last message repeated 9 times Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000010000000100000000000000 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 last message repeated 9 times Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC ID: 03000000 (3) Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: ... APIC VERSION: 00040011 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 last message repeated 9 times Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000010000000100000000000000 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000000000000000000000 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 last message repeated 8 times Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: 00000000000000010000000000000000 Nov 27 17:10:57 pc8-118 kernel: Now this looks really cryptic to me. Both outputs are different. - They are in displayed in a different order : APIC 3 then 0 before lock and APIC 0 then 3 after the lock. - Last line of the APIC 0 differ on one bit : Before lock 00000000000000010000000000000000 After lock 00000000000000000000000000000000 - Line 15 of APIC 3 differ : Before lock 00000000000000000100000000000000 After lock 00000000000000000000000000000000 > I am trying to pull documentation from ServerWorks -- they appear not to > want to share them with everyone. From marketing brochures available on > their web site I found out their chipsets feature integrated I/O APICs > which makes me quite suspicious the original problem with the timer IRQ > routing (i.e. not the secondary one you observe when the workaround gets > activated) lies in the chipset setup. The only informations that I can read in the manual are : ServerWorks LE 3.0 Chipset: features the ServerWorks LE 3.0 North Bridge and RCC Open South Bridge. Integrated IOAPIC: Supports full 32-APIC entries and removes the need for a separate IOAPIC chip. <<<< the source of the original problem ? I will try to find some technical specification on the web. Thank you. -- | Benjamin Monate | LRI - Bât. 490 | Université de Paris-Sud - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: Strange lockup of the timer with 2.4.0-test10 SMP (and older)
Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate Mon, 27 Nov 2000 08:48:23 -0800
- Strange lockup of the timer with 2.4.0... Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate
- Re: Strange lockup of the timer w... Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate
- Re: Strange lockup of the tim... Fort David
- Re: Strange lockup of the... Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate
- Re: Strange lockup of... Alan Cox
- Re: Strange lock... Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: Strange ... Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate
- Re: Stra... Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: Stra... Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate
- Re: Stra... Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate
- Benjamin Monate <Benjamin Monate