On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:54 -0400, Peter Keilty wrote: > john stultz wrote: > >On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 16:26 -0400, Peter Keilty wrote: > >>From: Peter Keilty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > >>Initial ia64 conversion to the generic timekeeping/clocksource code. > >> > >>Signed-off-by: Peter Keilty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>Signed-off-by: John Stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> > > Thanks so much for pushing this on! I suspect this patch needs to be > >updated a touch, as I'm not sure if it still compiles in light of recent > >changes... > > > You are correct, you need patch 3/3 for it to compile and run. > I did a patch to the orginal patch, thought that was correct thing to do. > But I can make a new patch 1 from the orginal of ours and my #3. > I would also make an update to the #2 patch from #3 for ntp correct change. > That would be just 2 patches then, the enable_ia64 and remove_interpolater. > What do you think?
Yep. That sounds like the right path to me. Its a good idea to make sure your patch set compiles each step of the way, so later folks can properly bisect through it looking for other issues. thanks -john - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
