On Thu, 12 Oct 2017, Tom Saeger <tom.sae...@oracle.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Tom Saeger <tom.sae...@oracle.com> > --- > .../RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html | 2 > +-
Someone(tm) should convert the last three html files to rst one of these days! In the mean time, I guess this is good enough. BR, Jani. > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git > a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html > > b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html > index e5d0bbd0230b..7394f034be65 100644 > --- > a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html > +++ > b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Expedited-Grace-Periods/Expedited-Grace-Periods.html > @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ grace period also drove it to completion. > This straightforward approach had the disadvantage of needing to > account for POSIX signals sent to user tasks, > so more recent implemementations use the Linux kernel's > -<a > href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/workqueue.txt";>workqueues</a>. > +<a > href="https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/core-api/workqueue.rst";>workqueues</a>. > > <p> > The requesting task still does counter snapshotting and funnel-lock -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
