Mike Castle writes: > Btw, was this ever tested on other arch's? I don't remember seeing > anything come across this list. Well, I've tested it on egcs-1.1.2 and RH's gcc 2.96 on ARM, both of which appear ok. _____ |_____| ------------------------------------------------- ---+---+- | | Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- | | | | http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html / / | | +-+-+ --- -+- / | THE developer of ARM Linux |+| /|\ / | | | --- | +-+-+ ------------------------------------------------- /\\\ | - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Andries . Brouwer
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Neil Brown
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Alexander Viro
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Rik van Riel
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Jeff V. Merkey
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Andries Brouwer
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Rik van Riel
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is bug... Olaf Dietsche
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is... Rik van Riel
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is... Mike Castle
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-5... Russell King
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is... J . A . Magallon
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Ion Badulescu
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Linux Kernel Developer
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Jakub Jelinek
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Frédéric L . W . Meunier
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Andries . Brouwer
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Matthew Vanecek
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Mikael Pettersson
- Re: gcc-2.95.2-51 is buggy Pavel Pisa;research student