On Fri, 24 Nov 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
> On Friday November 24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >> ... RedHat's GCC snapshot "2.96" handles this case just fine.
> >
> > > Now, if you can isolate the relevant part of the diff between
> > > 2.95.2 and RH 2.96...
> >
> > Maybe I have to be more precise in the statement "gcc 2.95.2 is buggy".
[image from FTP site not buggy]
> > This is from a SuSE distribution, I forget which, not very recent.
> > Revised summary: gcc-2.95.2-51 from SuSE is buggy.
>
> Ditto for gcc-2.95.2-13 from Debian (potato). It exhibits the
> same bug. Debian applies a total of 49 patches to gcc and the
> libraries.
The gcc-2.95.2-6cl from Conectiva 6.0 is buggy too.
(and the ISO images haven't even been available for
one week yet ... *sigh*)
regards,
Rik
--
Hollywood goes for world dumbination,
Trailer at 11.
http://www.conectiva.com/ http://www.surriel.com/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
