On Wed 27-09-17 14:13:52, Jens Axboe wrote:
> We're writing back the full range of dirty pages on the devices,
> there's no point in making this special and not do normal range
> cyclic writeback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
OK, since this is just ordinary "memory cleaning" writeback, I agree that
range_cyclic probably makes more sense. You can add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index bb6148dc6d24..65e6992d8719 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ void wakeup_flusher_threads(enum wb_reason reason)
>
> list_for_each_entry_rcu(wb, &bdi->wb_list, bdi_node)
> wb_start_writeback(wb, wb_split_bdi_pages(wb, nr_pages),
> - false, reason);
> + true, reason);
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
