On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 02:56:21PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> As Chris explains, get_seccomp_filter() and put_seccomp_filter() can
> use the different filters, once we drop ->siglock task->seccomp.filter
> can be replaced by SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_TSYNC.
> 
> Fixes: f8e529ed941b ("seccomp, ptrace: add support for dumping seccomp 
> filters")
> Reported-by: Chris Salls <chrissal...@gmail.com>
> Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com>

Ugh! Whoops.

Acked-by: Tycho Andersen <ty...@docker.com>

> ---
>  kernel/seccomp.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/seccomp.c b/kernel/seccomp.c
> index 98b59b5..897f153 100644
> --- a/kernel/seccomp.c
> +++ b/kernel/seccomp.c
> @@ -476,10 +476,8 @@ static inline void seccomp_filter_free(struct 
> seccomp_filter *filter)
>       }
>  }
>  
> -/* put_seccomp_filter - decrements the ref count of tsk->seccomp.filter */
> -void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +static void __put_seccomp_filter(struct seccomp_filter *orig)
>  {
> -     struct seccomp_filter *orig = tsk->seccomp.filter;
>       /* Clean up single-reference branches iteratively. */
>       while (orig && refcount_dec_and_test(&orig->usage)) {
>               struct seccomp_filter *freeme = orig;
> @@ -488,6 +486,12 @@ void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk)
>       }
>  }
>  
> +/* put_seccomp_filter - decrements the ref count of tsk->seccomp.filter */
> +void put_seccomp_filter(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +     __put_seccomp_filter(tsk->seccomp.filter);
> +}
> +
>  static void seccomp_init_siginfo(siginfo_t *info, int syscall, int reason)
>  {
>       memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
> @@ -908,13 +912,13 @@ long seccomp_get_filter(struct task_struct *task, 
> unsigned long filter_off,
>       if (!data)
>               goto out;
>  
> -     get_seccomp_filter(task);
> +     refcount_inc(&filter->usage);
>       spin_unlock_irq(&task->sighand->siglock);
>  
>       if (copy_to_user(data, fprog->filter, bpf_classic_proglen(fprog)))
>               ret = -EFAULT;
>  
> -     put_seccomp_filter(task);
> +     __put_seccomp_filter(filter);
>       return ret;
>  
>  out:
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 
> 

Reply via email to